Jump to content

Commons:Categories for discussion/2024/02/Category:Fallen trees on Raillines in the United States

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Certainly should not be capital-R, single word "Raillines". "rail lines"? "railway lines"? "rail tracks"? Something else? Jmabel ! talk 02:39, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmabel: Two of the images look like railroad tracks and one looks like an actual train. Do you know of a more general category they could fit into? Krok6kola (talk) 04:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any of the above would be an improvement; I’ll throw in “railways” for simplicity. I note the parent categories are “rail tracks“ (fallen trees) and “railway lines” (US), but I didn’t look further for a majority usage in those, ahem, trees.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 07:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Odysseus1479: Each of those images were already in categories about hurricane damage in the United States. So I think this particular category is unneeded. Krok6kola (talk) 15:27, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the category is useful. I could easily imagine someone looking for exactly this, and it would otherwise be hard to find. - Jmabel ! talk 17:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, I'm the creator of this category. I have no idea what was going on. I'll assume I was trying to reduce an overloaded category into subcategories or standardizing category names.
*  Category:Rail tracks blocked by fallen trees or branches is could be a subcategory of Category:Fallen trees in the United States, in which case, 'Fallen trees on Raillines in the United States' is more in line with that categories naming style.
* As to reducing the number of images in a category, none of the categories into which 'Fallen trees on Raillines in the United States' is linked is excessive in it's images.