Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 21 Jan 2026 at 05:59:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Cupressales#Family : Cupressaceae
Info Cypress cones of a Cupressus sempervirens 'Stricta'. Focus stack of 42 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:59, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2026 at 23:15:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2026 at 21:57:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Russia
Info Moscow State Historical Museum, close-up of facade. My photo. Юрий Д.К. 21:57, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 21:57, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:17, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2026 at 21:14:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info The building Kaiserfeldgasse 8, Leoben, Austria, constructed in the late 19th century; created, uploaded and nominated by Aciarium (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Pretty, though I would have preferred a bit more sky above the top of the building. However, the shadows on the left side are rather noisy, and what is that big bright spot on the upper left? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:
Done Thank you for your feedback! I have reduced the noise in the shadows and removed the lens flare on the upper right (I assume this was the bright spot you mentioned). --Aciarium (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2026 at 18:48:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Nephilidae (Nephilids)
Info No FPs of this genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very fine. The red portions of the legs look almost backlit. Acroterion (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Masterful!! Wolverine X-eye 21:03, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Orb-weavers are a photogenic group. JayCubby (talk) 21:50, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Fabulous. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:45, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive JackyM59 (talk) 07:53, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 09:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 12:02, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:28, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2026 at 10:33:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Greece
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2026 (UTC)- The lower part of the old town of Monemvasia, Greece, with the walls of the upper town visible above it. The town's pastel colors merge with the rock and soil, as if it is camouflaged.
Support -- C messier (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 11:14, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Really beautiful. Lots of colour nuances. JackyM59 (talk) 11:44, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:15, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Can you please clone out the blurry bird in the sky? Poco a poco (talk) 21:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco:
Done --C messier (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Poco a poco:
Support Feels a little crowded with these crops, but pretty. Should there be a personality rights template for the couple? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:52, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- I hadn't noticed them. --C messier (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jan 2026 at 08:58:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Morocco
Info The Sheker mosque in the sparsely-populated Daya Chiker area has the square minaret and rectangular shape characteristic of mosques in Morocco. Although the architecture is plain, this image from the road is simple yet imposing. Note: there are 41,000+ mosques in Morocco, but only 4 FPs of mosque exteriors. None shows a complete rural mosque. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:58, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 08:58, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 11:14, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:14, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:14, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Apart from a bit of noise it looks fine but neither detail nor compo/subject not lighting are extraordinary to me to support the grant of the FP star, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 21:36, 10 January 2026 (UTC)- Sensitive, and apart from the noise a very good presentation of this subject, but
Oppose per Poco. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Done Applied NR in the sky. To me, the appeal is the simplicity in contrast to the majesty of most FPs of religious buildings. --Tagooty (talk) 05:15, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- I respect that but don't consider it extraordinary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:25, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 22:26:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Motorcycles
Info Yamaha MT-09 Tracer, (2015 model), EBL-RN36J. c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Looks like a publicity photo. There are some minor CAs too be fixed.--C messier (talk) 10:35, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Fixed minor CAs, thanks. --Laitche (talk) 11:13, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:42, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 07:52, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:24, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 20:12:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Physalacriaceae
Info Dark honey fungus (Armillaria ostoyae) in the Bruderwald forest in Bamberg. Focus stack of 13 images. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 22:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Fantastic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. Is the moss Hypnum cupressiforme? FYI Ermell I've tagged some processing artifacts at the bottom of the image. JayCubby (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Lovely composition, excellent detail. Suggestion: the part of a leaf on the top margin could be cloned out. --Tagooty (talk) 09:02, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:36, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 10:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Info I modified the image slightly by removing distracting elements and adding blur to the moss. I'm not sure about the name of the moss. Thanks for the reviews. @JayCubby: @Tagooty: --Ermell (talk) 12:02, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not noticing more blur but didn't want that, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
CommentI blurred only the tips on the moss as suggested by JayCubby.--Ermell (talk) 10:17, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 09:03, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Wolverine X-eye 18:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 10:18:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Uzbekistan
Info Magok-i-Attari Mosque, Buhara, Uzbekistan. UNESCO site. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 10:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 10:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Crisp and angular lighting. The man on the left is a wee bit distracting . JayCubby (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:12, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 11:12, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:41, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:10, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 09:48:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#France
Info created by JackyM59 – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 09:48, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support - I feel like a bit more breathing room would have benefitted the composition a lot. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:50, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- I agree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:16, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition. --Laitche (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Leaning to oppose. Part of the pedestal is cut off. --Thi (talk) 12:47, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Info The cemetery is a small enclosed area in a field. With my 15mm lens, I wanted to take advantage of the late afternoon light on a cold day to capture the cross, the graves and the bouquets in the centre. To take the photo, I had to climb onto the low wall.... JackyM59 (talk) 12:57, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Room or space is not always required. In this case, I think this composition is the best choice. --Laitche (talk) 13:46, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:09, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The cross looks distorted, IMHO this scene is shouting for landscape format. Poco a poco (talk) 21:34, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination JackyM59 (talk) 06:40, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 09:03:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae#Genus : Charaxes
Info created by Anitava Roy – uploaded by Anitava Roy – nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Atudu (talk) 09:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Superb - JackyM59 (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Size of animal would be good to know. --Mile (talk) 10:04, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent photograph. -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 10:21, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:50, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Though I wonder if a slightly tighter crop at the bottom (equidistant) and sides (for aspect ratio) would improve composition. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. Wolverine X-eye 19:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Great photo of the grub, but there are a bunch of little spots. Dust spots? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:18, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- My guess is NR/stacking artifacts. Anitava Roy could that be fixed? JayCubby (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:13, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:59, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jan 2026 at 02:57:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Rosales#Family : Moraceae
Info Flowers of Prunus mume (Armenaca mume ‘Setsugekka’) at Nagai Park. c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 02:57, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 02:57, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:53, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and special! Radomianin (talk) 14:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 09:58, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 11:07, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Yellow|ø 15:14, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing wrong with this shot, nice, good quality but I miss something here to call it one of our finest. Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 21:50, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2026 at 20:39:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Caves
Info created and uploaded by Dave Bunnell, nominated by Yann
Info Large stalagmites in the passage of Hang Sơn Đoòng in Vietnam. The tallest has been measured at 70 meters in height.
Support -- Yann (talk) 20:39, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Well-handled artificial lighting! JayCubby (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:58, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:59, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:21, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:19, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support extraordinary miracle of nature well captured --Gower (talk) 07:24, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Good close up of the stalagmites. Good addition to the wider view in the existing FP of this subject. --Tagooty (talk) 09:07, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Jay and Tagooty. – Aristeas (talk) 21:49, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2026 at 11:32:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:18, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice soft light and autumn colors. --C messier (talk) 10:38, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:53, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice light. Isn't it a bit tilted in cw direction? Poco a poco (talk) 21:41, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Info I checked it. it is exactly vertical. --Llez (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per C messier. How often did I run to that castle when I was a child, hoping that today it would be open and I could climb the tower … but it was always closed. ;–) – Aristeas (talk) 21:48, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 20:24:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I like these kinds of pictures, and this is a good one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support It's nice to not see litter in places like this. Nice, classic compo. JayCubby (talk) 14:35, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- I picked up some litter before taking this picture just to make sure it wouldn't be distracting, but it was generally cleaner than what one would expect for such an abandoned place. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment боји несе баш спец, на лево тоже изгорено. Пробај црно-бело. --Mile (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Tranalation:
- “The colors aren’t really anything special; on the left it’s also burned out. Try black-and-white.” JayCubby (talk) 15:52, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 11:06, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Comment This is an alternative black-and-white version as suggested by Petar. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support this one too. JayCubby (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Awesome. Wolverine X-eye 21:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I like both versions, and each one has a different feel. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 10:01, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as creator and per Ikan's comment. Both versions are featurable on different merits. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:28, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:39, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I prefer this black-and-white version. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:55, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 11:06, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support The burnt white area at the left is a problem in the colour version, but OK in black-and-white. – Aristeas (talk) 21:46, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 18:47:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa
Info Coral (Euphyllia ancora), Anilao, Philippines. Note: there are yet no FPs on Commons belonging to the family Euphylliidae, that contains at least 845 species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Amazing! How big are the polyps? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting subject, but a bit underexposed for my taste. What's the white streak in the bottom-middle
JayCubby (talk) 00:51, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- I would also add more light. Yann (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- I third this. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:06, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Done FYI, JayCubby, Yann and Chris Woodrich Poco a poco (talk) 18:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you. JayCubby (talk) 19:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 13:19, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:19, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:42, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:52, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 14:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 15:31:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose A decent shot, but we have already better shots of this species in the FP gallery, like this one (among others). Poco a poco (talk) 15:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I gotta say that's a superb shot. Wolverine X-eye 15:59, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 16:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco —kallerna (talk) 17:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Poco a poco – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Now this crop is better. Good shot despite high ISO. Completely comparable with Charles shot. --Mile (talk) 20:09, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco is right that that photo is better than this one, but a cursory look at a few photos in the gallery seems to show that there are plenty of less sharp FPs of this bird. Therefore, I think the right thing to do is consider this excellent photo an FP and nominate some other FPs of this species for delisting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I believe having more Fp's people get more image options to choose from, I don't understand why people are trying to limit it. - Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:35, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Paramanu Sarkar: FPs are billed as the finest photos on Commons. With time, technology improves and more photographers bring in diversity and new appealing techniques. So, the bar for FP rightly rises over time. FPCs need to measure up to the standard of recent FPs, not standards of 10, 15 or 20 years ago. As Ikan Kekek said, some old FPs deserve to be delisted; this needs to be proposed by someone for each delist candidate. --Tagooty (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for the clarification, I agree with your view. FPs should be reviewed by standards and not numbers what I believe. Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 13:17, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Paramanu Sarkar: FPs are billed as the finest photos on Commons. With time, technology improves and more photographers bring in diversity and new appealing techniques. So, the bar for FP rightly rises over time. FPCs need to measure up to the standard of recent FPs, not standards of 10, 15 or 20 years ago. As Ikan Kekek said, some old FPs deserve to be delisted; this needs to be proposed by someone for each delist candidate. --Tagooty (talk) 12:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:20, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:26, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:46, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support There are 2 FPs of the same species, all show a bird perched in an almost identical posture. The other two images are higher resolution, while this one at 5 MP is barely adequate for FP. Initially, I was inclined to agree with Poco. However, the bokeh and colours in this nom are much superior to the 2 FPs: the colours complement those of the bird and the broad "brush strokes" add character. --Tagooty (talk) 12:46, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 17:07, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:25, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 21:44, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 13:11:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Herpestidae_(Mongooses)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Mongooses are apparently closer to felines than canines, but vulpine fits well. Great lighting and expression. JayCubby (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Lovely golden light. Wolverine X-eye 16:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 16:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:19, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Wolverine. – Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:43, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:55, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support fantastic! --Gower (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 11:22:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info A common gull (Larus canus) in flight – c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Not so common a shot! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:17, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, not such a common gull.Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 16:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice shot, but it's a common bird so I'm being picky: I find the background distracting. —kallerna (talk) 17:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I feel the contrast in warmth between the colors of the right and left wing make the image very pleasant – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great photo of a bird in flight! I totally understand kallerna's opposition but feel that the excellence of the capture of the bird overrides such concerns, which I mean no disrespect in saying they feel petty to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:27, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:25, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I hesitated when looking at the thumbnail, but when I view it in full size even the background works well for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:24, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose The composition is beautiful but for such a common bird the technical quality should also be perfect, and the wing is partially out of focus, the base of the wing seems overexposed beyond recovery and looks like there is a halo around the bird, as if the lens was smudged. --C messier (talk) 10:50, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment IMO, rotating it about 1.5° CCW would have worked better. --Laitche (talk) 13:25, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral I was about to concur with C messier, but I realized that, although it's a common bird, there are yet no FPs of this species. Poco a poco (talk) 21:40, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 11:23:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
Info A partially leucistic Eurasian coot (Fulica atra) walking on ice – c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 11:23, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 11:23, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support DOF works well, good feather detail, cool coloration. The claws are quite a sight! JayCubby (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Decent shot. Wolverine X-eye 16:02, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JackyM59 (talk) 16:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice capture. --BigDom (talk) 18:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:54, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great picture. Looks mischievous! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 04:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:26, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 14:12, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 19:31, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:49, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 08:51:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Rail vehicles#United Kingdom
Info Jacobite Express on Glenfinnan Viaduct, Scotland. Сreated by Eric Kilby – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 08:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive. Wolverine X-eye 16:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:41, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment There seems to be a bit of color noise when enlarged, especially on the front of the train and the background greenery – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:11, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Done - denoised Юрий Д.К. 18:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Impressive architecture, lovely autumnal colours and a nice train. Shame about the level of detail—the high ISO and subsequent noise reduction are pretty evident—but it's a very nice scene nonetheless. --BigDom (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Scottish Highland magic. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Not perfect, but good enough. --Laitche (talk) 23:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great to me, and I thought it was by Kabelleger until I looked at the author field. I take the point that many of Kabelleger's photos are more detailed, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 06:21, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:26, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Msb (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per BigDom and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --C messier (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Support If not this photo is in POTY finalist list, I'll be very surprised. Zquid (talk) 14:06, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment I had to see this [1] again now... :-D Zquid (talk) 14:08, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral A good shot but I find the crop too tight on top and left. I'd had waited for 2-3 more seconds to get a more balanced shot like this one. Poco a poco (talk) 21:55, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Fair. I agree that that's a better composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
- And I'm not so sure about that - then the train and the smoke hide the beautiful landscape and the C-shaped railroad. Also the train in the middle... perhaps balanced, but not so dynamic. But all this is just my opinion, off course... // Zquid (talk) 00:49, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
- Fair. I agree that that's a better composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
File:Pizza Entre Vinhos.jpg, not featured
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 04:26:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
Info created by Felipe Valduga – uploaded and nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 04:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 04:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose I believe it is just shy of the level of detail required. The background walls also have a bit of noise. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not a bad photo but not an FP in my opinion. Attention to detail in the composition (e.g. chair leg cut off at the bottom, one light sconce hidden behind branches, ironwork spike just touching the top of the frame in the centre) and lack of life in the scene are the main issues for me. BigDom (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per BigDom and also because this is a nice but not obviously featurable scene and would require a really outstanding composition and execution for me to consider it an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
File:Casco Viejo - 20348407051.jpg, not featured
Voting period ends on 16 Jan 2026 at 04:26:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info created by Felipe Valduga – uploaded by HJGN2 – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 04:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 04:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Attention to detail (light fixture on the left seemingly floating in midair, corner of the doorway cut off at bottom left) and boring light the main issues for me. --BigDom (talk) 19:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment It's also not a very attractive scene in certain ways, especially because the garbage bag is so prominently featured. That takes nothing away from the fact (to me) that it's a very good photo of a potentially featurable motif. I'm not sure whether it's an FP or not. I like the straight ahead view up the street very much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2026 at 22:04:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Otariidae_(Eared_Seals)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:04, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Expressive photo of great technical quality. I like the light coming in from the top-left. Are the colored stripes around the whiskers
chromatic aberration, camera artifacts, or processing artifacts? JayCubby (talk) 22:21, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Done, new file uploaded with CA fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:57, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:30, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great photo, but how do you know they're really fighting and not playing (play-fighting)? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's true that, at first sight, the one on the left seemed to want to play but the one one on the right was not happy about it and they bited each other in a quite agressive way and then the one from the right left so the whole scene looked more like a fight to me than playing. But since the photo was taken before the violent acts I could eventually rename the picture to change "seals fighting" to "seal wanting to play" but the thing is I'm not 100% sure the one on the left really wanted to play because it also looked like it was bullying the one from the right -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- The more I think about the scene the more the one from the left just seemed to be bullying the one from the right before their big violent bites so I don't think I will rename the file -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Don't. You saw the whole scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- The more I think about the scene the more the one from the left just seemed to be bullying the one from the right before their big violent bites so I don't think I will rename the file -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- It's true that, at first sight, the one on the left seemed to want to play but the one one on the right was not happy about it and they bited each other in a quite agressive way and then the one from the right left so the whole scene looked more like a fight to me than playing. But since the photo was taken before the violent acts I could eventually rename the picture to change "seals fighting" to "seal wanting to play" but the thing is I'm not 100% sure the one on the left really wanted to play because it also looked like it was bullying the one from the right -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:40, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:22, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:18, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting...Wolverine X-eye 16:05, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:03, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --BigDom (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 04:22, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 07:27, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:38, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:21, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Jay. – Aristeas (talk) 19:11, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 03:10, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:12, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support ... aaand another one from my "Will nominate soon"-list I can remove from that list... :-) // Zquid (talk) 13:49, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jan 2026 at 17:51:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Anthozoa
Info Bubble coral (Plerogyra sinuosa), Anilao, Philippines. The "bubbles", of up to 2.5 cm (1 in) in diameter, are grape-sized which increase their surface area according to the amount of light available: they are larger during the day, but smaller during the night, when tentacles reach out to capture food. This species requires low light and a gentle water flow. It ranges from the Red Sea and Madagascar in the western Indian Ocean to Okinawa and the Line Islands in the Pacific. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support: fascinating fauna. I think the image is a bit too blue, though. Other photos show the coral as closer to cream-white. JayCubby (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 19:06, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:33, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:13, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:53, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice, detailed photo of an interesting creature I never knew existed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The WB needs to be fixed. —kallerna (talk) 17:35, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version, —kallerna, happy now? FYI, too JayCubby. Poco a poco (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, thank you! JayCubby (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version, —kallerna, happy now? FYI, too JayCubby. Poco a poco (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great capture of a species I didn't know about before; thank you very much for the improved white balance! -- Radomianin (talk) 09:04, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 12:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:46, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support wow, looks like a treasure! --Gower (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 20:28:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Primates#Genus : Macaca (Macaques)
Info A hybrid between a common species and the langur which is Critically Endangered. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 21:21, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 03:28, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. How far away were you from this thoughtful-looking monkey? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Just a couple of metres I guess, as I didn't use full zoom. Uncropped and focus-stacked from 5 images. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:32, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:16, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:05, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:56, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Harsh light, awkward background. —kallerna (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:41, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jan 2026 at 08:32:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Geraniaceae
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful flower. What is the background? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:28, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. The background is a fabric textured paper painted with matt acrylic paint. The flowers are illuminated by the sunlight from my window. -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 09:59, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 16:13, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:06, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 01:14, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:34, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I fail to see anything special here. —kallerna (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2026 at 11:29:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Portugal
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 11:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:29, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Overprocessed image of easy subject. —kallerna (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment I like it, but I'd like to hear from you on how it is overprocessed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:08, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:35, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 21:46, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I'm still waiting to hear how it's overprocessed, but it's an exciting composition to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:03, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2026 at 16:54:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Germany
Info Fountain at Seehof Castle in Memmelsdorf near Bamberg, orthophoto. Distance to the ground approx. 100 m. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support At first, I was struck by the brightness of the sun on the water. Very good, and an interesting view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:19, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 08:40, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:22, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:21, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Harsh light & shadows. —kallerna (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:31, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:37, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support per Kallerna. --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Too tight crop at the sides. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:35, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support With this subject (in Germany I would call it ein grafisches Motiv) the high contrast works very well, so IMHO the light and shadows are fine. But I have to agree that the photo would gain by a slightly wider crop at the left and right. @Ermell: Any chance for some extra pixels at the left and right? – Aristeas (talk) 16:43, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your vote. Since the cascades only run on the hour, the ideal time is actually between 2 pm and 3 pm. Here at 3 pm, the shadows of the tall trees unfortunately get in the way when you look straight down from above. I've tried several options, but unfortunately haven't found a way to get the entire fountain in the picture yet. Ermell (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- I understand this is not an easy shot. – Aristeas (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your vote. Since the cascades only run on the hour, the ideal time is actually between 2 pm and 3 pm. Here at 3 pm, the shadows of the tall trees unfortunately get in the way when you look straight down from above. I've tried several options, but unfortunately haven't found a way to get the entire fountain in the picture yet. Ermell (talk) 09:06, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose - Agree with Sebring; the sides need breathing room. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose crop. --BigDom (talk) 18:50, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with the concerns about the crop Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Neutral, in line with the concerns of those who opposed. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:28, 11 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 21:38:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
*{{o}} It might be QI because the sharpness is good, but I'm not sure because the detail isn't good enough. I think it's below what you'd expect from an FP image. Why wov? --Lmbuga (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- I’m unsure why do you think the detail isn’t good enough when the ornaments are clearly visible at full size (even the curves around the greened areas of the copper can be carefully observed). As for the wow factor, this is an unusual example of an Eastern Orthodox Church door with neo-Baroque decoration, and the motif is missing from the FP category. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I may be mistaken. Now I have a better impression: I withdraw my vote--Lmbuga (talk) 15:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 07:46, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 11:22, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking in its simplicity, the image captures light, texture, and form with quiet honesty; there is a slight blur towards the top, likely from perspective correction, but it is minimal and does not detract from the overall quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:04, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:18, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:38, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, nothing special IMO. —kallerna (talk) 07:10, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:29, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Kallerna, though it looks like we'll be outvoted, and that's OK. It's possible I might find a photo of this door special in warmer light, but maybe not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:20, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 19:12, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose A nice door but I would also like to see better light for FP. --BigDom (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 11:16, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I concur with Ikan Kekek. Poco a poco (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 07 Jan → Mon 12 Jan Thu 08 Jan → Tue 13 Jan Fri 09 Jan → Wed 14 Jan Sat 10 Jan → Thu 15 Jan Sun 11 Jan → Fri 16 Jan Mon 12 Jan → Sat 17 Jan
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 03 Jan → Mon 12 Jan Sun 04 Jan → Tue 13 Jan Mon 05 Jan → Wed 14 Jan Tue 06 Jan → Thu 15 Jan Wed 07 Jan → Fri 16 Jan Thu 08 Jan → Sat 17 Jan Fri 09 Jan → Sun 18 Jan Sat 10 Jan → Mon 19 Jan Sun 11 Jan → Tue 20 Jan Mon 12 Jan → Wed 21 Jan
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
